Comments on: Operation Blockhead – The Federal Income Tax Scam

By: Dave Wilber

Dave Wilber — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:09:00 +0000

There are two levels of freemasonry, the esoteric and the exoteric with the latter knowing what Freemasonry is and the former thinking its fun and games.
Albert Pike was the highest Mason in American history. He wrote Morals and Dogma in 1871. On pasges 104 and 819 he said the higher Masons mislead all below them. He also said that Lucifer is god.
The New Age was the official publication of the Scottish Rite in 1950 and they said that thir god was \dedicated to the unification of all races, religions and credes\ and that their god has chosen the \great American public schools to help bring on their new world order, for exact words, see:
http://www.morpix.biz/newage . I believe the New Age has been renamed.
So, the god of Freemasonry is Lucifer and the goal of Freemasonry is to impose their religion the world. I would say that they are very successful at imposing their religion on the world as it is based on unfulfilled prophecy. Careful reading of the Bible will show that all prophecy was fuilfilled long ago. Few can stand the truth, no one wants information that conflicts with their beliefs. Psychologists call it \cognitive dissonance\ when the mind involuntarily rejects infiormation that is not in line or cognizant with previous beliefs or actions.
Far too many preachers preach that Jesus is coming but not one line in Bible says, hints, suggests or implies that He will come IN OUR FUTURE while 20 verses say He would return before the disciples all died. Two verses that church goers must cut out or black out to maintain their belief in unfulfilled prophecy: Luke 21:22 and Rev.1:3. \At hand\ in Rev.1:3 should have the exact same meaning as found in other verses. The true gospel requires that the reader should ALWAYS consider who was talking or writing to whom. AT NO TIME was Jesus talking to us, WE WERE NOT THERE! Many believe that when Paul wrote to the Thessalonians, he was writing to us but the top of the page says \Paul’s 1st Epistle to the Thessalonians. When Jesus said \Render unto caesar\ He was speaking to the Herodians, NOT TO US.
I asked a Catholic priest why Catholics and Lutherans all believe that Jesus is coming at the end of the world and he replied that I have a King James Bible and that is not in the Catholic Boble. HE LIED. See He.9:26.

The world ended and you missed it TWICE! The first emd of the world is found
in 2 Peter 3:6, the 2nd, He.9:26 but THE EARTH ABIDETH FOREVER Ec.1:4 While the earth is the planet, the worlds that ended were groups of people. See: Jeremiah 51:15 This could help truth seekers: http://www.morpix.biz/pre
Infamous Masdons include/d Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Castro, Clinton, Bush,
ad nauseam! ALL take oaths under penalty of death to support the Grand Lodge

By: Reb

Reb — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 03:13:55 +0000

A few thoughts on a long-dead thread that will never be read:

All indictments for income taxes rely upon conclusions of law to contend the accused is “liable,” received “taxable income,” filed tax forms in previous years and therefore “knew he had a responsibility for an income tax,” etc. Defendants, including Tom Cryer, consistently contend the 16th. Amendment does not make them taxable, or present their favorite theory as to why they are not taxable (as listed on Quatloos), or in some way allow the burden of proof to be shifted to them while the IRS escapes the requirement of carrying the burden of proof that a valid law imposes the unidentified tax. This shifting of the burden of proof requires the accused to prove there is NO POSSIBLE WAY the (unidentified) tax MIGHT be valid. It cannot be done. Ref. http://www.triallogs.com/index.php?/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,43/topic,705.0/
Titled Frivolous Tax Arguments.

The federal courts have consistently ruled the income tax indictments fulfill the requirements of Due Process with the US v Vroman case being a leading example. The Vroman opinion has been analyzed to be inconsistent with Supreme court case law and is a complete perversion of Due Process. The analysis is in the form of a Motion to Dismiss the Indictment. Ref. http://www.synapticsparks.info/misc/motion.html It is available to anyone involved in an income tax prosecution.

To Dave Dassie: You will note that Section 6020 is never cited in an income tax indictment and is not submitted to contestation. You will also notice the section repeated declares the section applies to “those required by this Title.” Where is the section that states who is required by this title ? It is not 6020. Also, a statute that grants prima facia status to documents created by the Director does not prevent a challenge to make the Director evidence a law that makes the citizen a “taxpayer.” But that assumes the courts are playing with a full deck of Due Process.

By: Eldon Warman

Eldon Warman — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:00:37 +0000

It seems that the whole lot of the people named as being anti-income tax gurus
under your heading: “Operation Blockhead – The Federal Income Tax Scam” have missed the key as to how the income tax is imposed upon the American people and why. May I suggest your readers go to my website and download the free blog offered there, called The Name Game Blog. Actually, anything I offer on my website is free of cost, as long as I don’t have to send it by snail mail.

I do suggest some remedies; however, 90% of finding a solution is first finding the cause, and most have missed that by several miles. And, as long as people don’t know the true nature of income tax, they are easy targets for IRS moles and their sting operations to get even more out of the people in fines, punishments and huge contrived assessments.

By: Sisco

Sisco — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:50:27 +0000

I’m missing “Operation Blockhead” magazine. Tried to download it but it’s just not there? Anyone have it saved and if so do you mind sending it to me?

Thanks
Sisco

By: Robert Burrows

Robert Burrows — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 15:23:56 +0000

For Gus Metz;

As a fellow Brother Mason and a member of the Constitution Party Thank you!

By: Dave Dassie

Dave Dassie — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:53:27 +0000

It continues to amaze me that people jump up and down saying \Show me the law\ and do not file a proper and accurate 1040. The law is very clear in this:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/search/display.html?terms=6020&url=/uscode/html/uscode26/usc_sec_26_00006020—-000-.html

TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 61 > Subchapter A > PART II > Subpart D > § 6020 Returns prepared for or executed by Secretary

(a) Preparation of return by Secretary
If any person shall fail to make a return required by this title or by regulations prescribed thereunder, but shall consent to disclose all information necessary for the preparation thereof, then, and in that case, the Secretary may prepare such return, which, being signed by such person, may be received by the Secretary as the return of such person.
(b) Execution of return by Secretary
(1) Authority of Secretary to execute return
If any person fails to make any return required by any internal revenue law or regulation made thereunder at the time prescribed therefor, or makes, willfully or otherwise, a false or fraudulent return, the Secretary shall make such return from his own knowledge and from such information as he can obtain through testimony or otherwise.
(2) Status of returns
Any return so made and subscribed by the Secretary shall be prima facie good and sufficient for all legal purposes.

Look up in any law dictionary and you will find that Prima Facia means evidence that is sufficient to raise a presumption of fact or to establish the fact in question UNLESS REBUTTED.

So for all those of you who the company you work for submitted a W-2, 1099 or a K1 information return about you, the IRS has Prima Facie evidence that you had taxable income. Don’t rebut it and what some 3rd party says about stands as legal fact.

THERE’s THE LAW!!

cheers

By: Ron Moss

Ron Moss — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:13:00 +0000

Google the Supreme Court findings for the 16th Amendment. It did not extend any taxing power to congress it did not already have. Assuming it was properly ratified, which it was not proven to be, God Speed

By: Michael F Wright

Michael F Wright — Wed, 20 May 2009 04:24:38 +0000

I was very intrigued by this income tax issue, but, since I get paid an hourly wage I cannot choose to pay or not, it’s just taken automatically. Are there any suggestions as to what I can do till I become self employed? I know when I file my income taxes(as they were already paid), I get a check for some of what I paid back, so what is the use of me not filing if I get some of it back? Why is there nothing suggested to wee folk like me the ‘wage slave’. Any suggestions? . . . . .

By: Bill Gillin

Bill Gillin — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:51:43 +0000

I’m all for throwing off the “yoke” of income tax tyranny. That’s yoke, like what you attach to a beast of burden such as an ox. Throwing off a “yolk” would involve eggs! It would be fun to “egg” the Congressmen responsible for this tax burden!

By: hardtruth

hardtruth — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:15:22 +0000

My grandfather and mother were worthy master of masons.I also became a mason.
I tell you the truth: Masonary is about pride and selfrightiousness. Pride comes before a fall. If we could make our selves clean and good on the inside; it would not be nessasery for “I AM” to put on the flesh and die on the cross. If you axpress this mentality in the masons,you will be shown the door. Jesus is God and if you can not exort in His name, then what king of god are they saying we should beleive in. My disernment is that there light and god is satan. This puting your hand on the bible is a fraud. Reading about Soloman and avoiding Jesus was my clue. Soloman was into the ocults and and he brought back the six pointed star to Israel from Babalon. It was not his fathers idea. It should be called the star of Soloman.
Jesus is not a religion, He’s God. The “I AM” of Moses.